3.
1728 — The “Dozen Cube”.
12³ = 1728
That’s why:
- a gross = 144
- a great gross = 1728
Old trading systems were built around this cube.
What “gross” and “great gross” are
They’re based on duodecimal (base-12) counting, not base-10.
When trading systems started using them
Antiquity → Medieval period
-
Base-12 and base-60 counting came from Mesopotamia (c. 3000 BCE).
-
By Roman and medieval Europe, trade commonly used:
-
This was especially common for physical goods:
-
nails, buttons, pens
-
cloth fasteners
-
candles
-
playing cards
-
early manufactured items
Why?
-
12 divides cleanly into halves, thirds, quarters, and sixths.
-
This mattered in a world without calculators or standardized weights.
By 1200–1600 CE, gross and great gross were standard commercial quantities in Europe.
When they peaked
1400s–1700s (early capitalism)
This was their golden age:
-
Guild systems priced goods by the gross
-
Wholesale contracts often specified grosses
-
Warehousing and shipping used them because they packed efficiently
-
Accounting books routinely referenced them
At this stage, they weren’t “special numbers” — just practical ones.
When they began to decline
Late 1700s–mid-1800s
Several forces pushed them out:
1. Decimalization
-
France introduced the metric system (1790s)
-
Other nations followed slowly
-
Base-10 math simplified taxation and accounting
2. Modern finance and abstraction
-
Trading shifted from goods to prices, futures, and contracts
-
Decimal currency (cents, pence) became dominant
-
Ratios replaced unit-counts
3. Industrial standardization
-
Factories preferred:
-
round base-10 quantities
-
standardized SKUs
-
uniform packaging
By 1850–1900, gross and great gross were no longer core trading units in financial systems.
Did trading systems ever “stop” using them?
Not completely.
They survived in niches:
But:
-
Markets, exchanges, and financial trading systems stopped using them entirely.
-
They don’t appear in modern price discovery, order books, or settlement systems.
Important clarification
Gross and great gross were counting units, not pricing ratios.
Modern trading systems moved toward:
That’s why numbers like 1.618 (phi) show up conceptually, while 144 disappeared operationally.
Why this question is interesting
Gross (144) didn’t vanish because it was wrong — it vanished because trade stopped being about counting objects and became about abstract value flows.
Base-12 was better for hands and goods
Base-10 was better for ledgers and machines